Inside NetX: funding, bridge & payment roles | reviewed 10 Oct 2026 Diagram

Reference key | same contract / same chain

R1 6EC153: upper funding graph ··· NetX provisioning (same NetX address).
R4 2cca: Polygon deployment ··· Polygon payment execution (same contract).
R5 f97f: Morph bootstrap ··· Morph payment execution (same contract; also in legacy authority).

Reference key | shared operational addresses

R2 AbD2: upper graph ··· NetX provisioning ··· Morph bootstrap. NetX and Morph balances are separate.
R3 EC7908: upper graph ··· Morph bootstrap. Same address across chains, NOT a bridge leg.
R6 d203: Morph bootstrap ··· Morph relayer (same chain) ··· Polygon relayer (separate chain).

Reference key | cross-chain participants

R7 3534: Polygon payer ··· Morph payer. Same address, separate orders.
R8 292A: Polygon recipient ··· Morph recipient. Same address, merchant identity unproven.
R9 fa370: BSC funding ··· Polygon deployer. Address correspondence only, NOT bridged BNB/POL.
Dotted keys have NO direction and create NO funding, settlement or control route. Official wallets remain unlinked.

Confirmed: funding, control and execution differ

Solid amount arrows show observed transfers; security arrows show technical authority, not money movement.
Gate sent 99.318 POL to Polygon deployer fa370, not to the router. Creation value was zero.
BSC b67a sent the same fa370 address 0.01 BNB; no movement of this lot to Polygon is established.

Confirmed: the 120-address branch is separate

6EC153 funded bcA918; three native batches provided 104 NETX to 120 addresses.
The second 100-NETX funding came after the initial batch. Do not call all 250 NETX pre-funding.
AbD2 supplied four locally deployed token inventories. USDC/USDT labels here are not official stablecoins.

Confirmed: parallel payments, not router custody

24 Sep: same payer 3534, relayer d203 and recipient 292A on Polygon and Morph.
Each sponsorPay moved 0.0066 USDC directly payer to recipient, not through router balances.
Two orders, 11m33s apart; 0.0132 USDC total. Do not count execution arrows as more volume.

Strong operational inference; purpose unconfirmed

Shared funders, technical roles and prepared cohorts support coordinated infrastructure operation.
120-address activity strongly fits coordinated testing, not evidence of 120 independent customers.
Repeated addresses across panels are the same address on the labelled chain, not additional wallets.

Not established / bounded historical snapshot

No continuous Gate → router → 120-address asset flow or Polygon/Morph → NetX settlement is established.
No common legal owner, exchange-account owner, named merchant, Lawson/NETSTARS link or NETX-demand conclusion.
Evidence through 9 Oct; revised 10 Oct 2026. Not a fresh all-network audit. Public transaction proofs: Sources & methodology.

Official declaration, not an observed funding path

20 Sep: four full addresses were published in an image, omitted from the generated secondary summary.
10 Oct: all four have zero native balance / nonce / code on NetX, BSC, Polygon and Morph; BSC NETX = 0.
NetX/BSC/Morph reviewed indices are empty. Polygon history is blocked; no cluster link established.
The source plans staged allocations. Liquidity support is not proof of trading or a market-maker mandate.